You are now being logged in using your Facebook credentials


Comments (32)

Load Previous Comments
  • Daniel Franklin

    Report Permalink

    I'm pretty sure I wouldn't want a 928...but a 911....oh yeah!

    from Oceanside, CA, USA
  • Guest (Ranger)

    Report Permalink

    Pretty hard to say not owning either one I'll bet. I've had my 928S for 14 years. It'll outlast me, and out drive, out-muscle 350Z's and the like. As for the 928's looks. I haven't taken it out for a drive once in all those years without it receiving compliments (yelled from patio bars, pedestrians, people in parking lots, etc.). It's like a good Rolex (yeah... have a couple of those 2... like the 928, for the quality, NOT the name)... timeless in design. Now we see a LOT of the TOP sport (super) car builders going back to the engine in the front, transmission in the back. Seems 928 was decades ahead of it's time and not then (more-so now) well-accepted by box-thinkers.

  • ChazzyD

    Report Permalink

    I owned a mechanically neglected, but very nicely repainted '79 model for 2 1/2 years. It looked like the car from Risky Business as it was a similar color. I drove that thing all over the east coast as a photographer. I of course had to catch up on the deferred maintenance, but it never let me down except for the first evening I drove it after purchase with alternator issues. A swap from the Paris-Rhone to a Bosch alternator fixed that. The purchase price was very little, but the parts expenditure was quite high to catch up to what it needed to bring it to my mechanical standards. Not really a super hard car to work on, but everything took quite a bit of time to accomplish. Fortunately my labor was free and I did all of it including the timing belt and water pump. Not too bad to do on an early model and not even an interference engine in '79. I miss the car, but do not miss the poor gas mileage especially since prices have only gone up since owning it. The Bosch CIS was easy to tune and worked pretty well, though not efficient.
    My early model always seemed like something Mercedes would have built if they had built a sports car, more than it felt like a Porsche actually. Mine did have the Mercedes auto trans in the back and you really could carve a corner it in with all the weight in the back that you could really feel. The doors closed with a solidity that would made a Mercedes proud as well.
    A super planted car in the rear I have never felt before or since. So planted in the back, mine seemed to be impossible to make the tail come out even on loose surfaces. The 928 is really an amazing highway car and that is how I used it. It really was smooth and quiet on the interstate, solid and heavy feeling, very stable and could gobble the miles up with ease holding a very precise line at speed. Just be ready at the pump especially if you have been driving it briskly.

  • Leucea Alexandru

    Report Permalink

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i2mMkC8HrTI "I wish that Porsche still made it today"

  • ratters

    Report Permalink

    I have had a batch of 928's over the years. Reliability issues were almost soley attributable to mechanics who had no clue. When I worked on them myself, all the problems vanished. I have a 29 year old car in the garage that was properly maintained by someone who understood the car, and it has no significant issues. Buy one poorly maintained, and you can easily pay more than if you just spent more and got a good one to start with.

    That said, not a car for the feint hearted or the weak walleted.

    Dumb Issues come from people letting them sit extended periods and not drain the radiator. Aluminium motor + old coolant = stuffed head gaskets. Or the classic, not understanding the steering radiuous, and sending it to a numbnutz wheel aligner who tells you "it can't be set up right" cause he insists on lifting the car to do the alignment.

    Real unavoidable issues are heat under bonnet (over time) affects wiring, but it's pretty easy to spot brittle wiring.

    And the Manual is a totally different animal to the Auto. Chalk and cheese.


    This is a car that the AXLE setup alone would cost more to make in the present day than it would to buy a brand new basic runabout. There is nothing cheap about them, in build quality or in components. And while people talk about complication, that was then. Take a modern car, move it forward 12 years, and see the sort of money it would takje to keep it on the road.

    If I drove my Ford like I drove the 928, the Ford would be dead and buried inside 2 years. The 928 LOVES to be driven hard. The auto alone (mecedes box modified by Porsche) is designed to take over 1600 HP.

    Fabulous cars, where, if you do make a mistake on a winding mountain road, won't have you rear end over the precipice by it's much vaulted sybling, the 911. Even the new ones, with all the improvements to counter the obvious problem of all the weight at the back, even now they are always the ones leaving the race track BACKWARDS.

    2 cents now spent

    from Brisbane QLD, Australia
  • Burt Munro

    Report Permalink

    I love them because they are so simple (in absolute terms). No SMDs in the electronics, just parts you can troubleshoot with a meter and an o-scope and get delivered from DigiKey or Mouser the next day, not that they fail often anyway. Window and seat switches can be popped apart and shine the contacts for full functionality. L-Jet gives you everything you need save for MAP and TPS to MegaSquirt it. Climate head is simple, most bearings are standard units (once you learn the numbers), OEM parts flow through the side channels and if you need used, it's always out there.

    Best part? Almost all the updates are bolt-on to 83+ cars. My 84 has almost all the features of a 93 GTS, except the engine. ABS/PSD/suspension/bigblacks/booster/rack/alt/ps pump/etc all just bolted right on.

  • Guest (Ranger)

    Report Permalink

    Nice post. I've had my 928S for 14 years. You (we both) know your 928's!

  • Paul Dembry

    Report Permalink

    In the 20 years that I have owned my 1990 928 GT (second owner), I think that I have spent 7k for repairs. I don't consider that expensive to maintain. It has 97k on the clock and I expect to own it for another 30+ years. The CD player died about 8 years ago so I just open the windows and sunroof and listen to the engine while I drive. It was about $80k new in 1990 and I paid $30 four years later. This is why I am so thankful for rich people. Without them, I would never have been able to own such a beauty.

    from California, USA
  • braunwagen

    Report Permalink

    Fortunately, the average Petrolicious writer (who most likely drives a Volvo 240) is not intelligent enough to realize that when you own a 928, you have to do this crazy thing called: CHANGE THE TIMING BELT! Most high performance cars of the same era, such as the Lotus Esprit or Ferrari 308, need it done every 20K miles or less! 928's only need it done every 30K miles and it cost less than a 911 valve adjustment. So every time I read a snarky article about 928's, I thank God for making the clueless 20 something year old automotive blogger who wrote the uneducated article. Cheers to you, Petrolicious, and to your spectacularly predictable and boring taste in cars. Now the people who actually appreciate the 928 can continue to buy them up before the prices go through the roof!

    from Tokyo, Japan
  • Guest (racer129)

    Report Permalink

    Notice all the comments are from 928 owners. The 928 was a period piece, a bit of 80's nostalgia, reminiscent of the expensive AMC Pacer. The 911 is timeless in it's lines and execution. There is no comparison.